Full Universal Theory

Explaining the Universe is not necessarily the most complicated task there is, but absorbing the concept might be, so it's no surprise that any detailed explanation requires clear content and lateral thinking to understand. Generally, theories that indicate an origin of the Universe must by nature lean towards including the need for some form of a Creator as the mechanism for how it could have begun from nothing, which somewhat limits the options, so others attempt to remove the need for a Creator by including the base assumption that it has always existed. However, because of the significant difficulty in proving or disproving a Creator, popular science has chosen to begin the most widely accepted theory - the Big Bang - at the moment after creation, thus removing the 'how' or 'if' the Universe came into being from the equation. In doing so, however, such theories only indicate the workings of the Universe and form only a part of the bigger picture of the actual Universe itself. Such theories by necessity must still fit within the full reality and actuallity of the Universe's existence, but by excluding the actuallity of the Universe, it makes them of questionable value, because if it doesn't fit or can't be shown to fit, it is pointless. Therefore, Full Universal Theory incorporates its actuallity also. Over the years there have been many theories that have attempted to explain the Universe but in many cases have left people unconvinced and divided by theories that either proposed origins / beginning of a Universe in which something is required to come into existence from nothing, or by other theories that require certain aspects of the Universe to be infinite - without beginning or end - without a widely accepted explanation of how something can be infinite. The model of curving the universe back on itself is the main explanation for infinity and requires the subject in question (such as 'space') to be curved (over long distances, thus appearing straight), so that it eventually meets itself again (as in a circle), which has no beginning or end and is therefore infinite. However, the two aspects above make the acceptance of any theory difficult by the general community (and even within the scientific community) because they are complex to satisfactorily (and sometimes scientifically) explain and are all but impossible to prove, given it is not possible to demonstrate or reproduce the entire Universe in the laboratory. One reason why we can't find a fully encompassing explanation may just be that both the above opposing Univeral concepts of 'infinity' and 'creating something from nothing' are completely wrong. There is however an alternate explanation that allows for the existence of the Universe indefinitely, which should not be confused with infinity. This same explanation explains the embodiment of physical things within theory, which should not be confused with things being created from nothing. If you are wondering what is the difference in these terms and how they could relate in a Universal sense, the following explanation is an attempt to clarify it. Let's start with what the Universe contained a moment after what we call Creation - a highly concentrated region of raw energy and nothing else. At that moment, ALL things that we know now to have occurred subsequently existed then only in theory (as these things were yet to occur). They were not physically embodied at that point, yet we know that what was only theory then was still accurate and real because we can now witness them. At the moment after creation however, they were still pending the necessary events to occur and convert them into physical reality. This is essentially in line with the Big Bang theory. The thing to absorb here is that existing 'in theory' is still a form of reality, it's just the 'time' factor that moves things from one state to another and this is the variable aspect. We will talk about time shortly. Let's step back to the moment before Creation, at a point that even this raw energy was not yet physically embodied and existed only in theory; in other words the entire Universe existed only in theory and everything within the theory is real, but yet to occur. We could therefore define Full Universal Theory essentially as the reality that will occur if a specific energy source with specific properties exists and is released in a specific way, so that all subsequent theoretical events find physical embodiment after sufficient interaction between raw energy and subsequently created relevant elements. Ultimately, we get to the point we are today of the physical embodiment of many naturally occurring events, as well as those that can only occur in controlled circumstances that require intelligent intervention in a manufacturing process (such as by people), with more theory still to yet be physically embodied in the future. This still leaves the question about where did this energy come from and who released it? (God?) If we assume God, then this theory is as questionable as all others, because who can know the mind of God? Alternatively, let's look at that moment before creation again, when the entire Universe existed only as theory. Full Universal Theory is different from all sub theories in a very significant way - sub theories all require actual events to occur PRIOR to initiate their conversion from theory to reality and that makes them only a part of a bigger theory. Sub theory must therefore be considered as incomplete theory because until that prior event/s occurs, the physical embodiment of it cannot exist as they are dependent on other actualities to occur. Full Universe theory is complete. It is fully self contained and by including the existence of raw energy and its properties within the theory itself and therefore its expansive release (not injection) as the starting point, then ALL actualities of this theory occur WITHOUT any prior events to initiate it, which means that the physical embodiment of all things within Full Universal Theory do exist in reality at different stages within the theory. Here's the part that takes a bit of lateral thinking. As mentioned, Full Universal Theory is by nature fully encompassing and although the theory has a starting point, it must not to be confused with an origin, because theory exists always (it is not a man made concoction) so it has no origin. Full Universal Theory is simply the logical sequence of events for all things and events that would occur in an increasingly complex organisation of matter from the interaction of raw energy and it's subsequent interactions with other matter, caused by the properties within the energy and the events that subsequently happen, based on the raw energy being released in a specified way as previously stated. Progressing through the theory (that's the part we call time) leads into the en-action of each of the sub theories in logical sequence. So the Full Universal Theory does not need to be created by any deity, it's just the reality of what would happen if energy within the theory containing certain properties was released in a certain way. Perhaps it may help to think of theory like a comic strip - all the frames cocurrently exist in reality, but you can concentrate on only one at a time before progressing along to the next. Your concentration on any one frame in the current time does not restrict the existence of the other frames, even though they are in the past or future of your attention. This analogy however is not entirely desirable, for a comic strip needs to be created, whereby theory exists regardless of a creator. Now this is where Full Universal Theory gets really interesting - if you can imagine that the expansion of energy in theory and all subsequent events happening in theory and consider that because we are a part of this theory - we are actually able to exist (i.e. be real) inside the self perpetuating Universal theory, WITHOUT requiring outside intervention! Recapping, physical embodiment is merely representative of Full Universal Theory of the distribution and interaction of raw energy and resultant matter, rather than actual existence as defined by human understanding of the meaning, thus negating the requirement of the physical needing to be created from 'nothing'. In summary, real theory is not created (by us or God). By definition, theory is simply the logical framework of which physical embodiment can occur or exist within it. Although sub theory includes the need for a prior event/s to occur and thus provide a logical sequence of events for the successful enactment of other theory, Full Universal Theory requires no such prior event to have occurred and therefore all that is within its framework exists indefinitely and independently of any action or 'Creator'. The 'walls' of our Universe are simply the boundaries of the Full Universal Theory as defined by the properties of the originating energy. It is worth noting at this point that our Universe may not even be unique. Variations of the properties of energy may exist in an indefinate number of other Universal theories also, but even the slightest variation from our version MAY mean other Universes could not evolve or exist in perpetuity, in which case, it would render our model unique. For those that insist in a deity, a small modification of having the energy source injected (not released) into the model by the Creator can be made, rather than its existence being contained within Full Universal Theory, however, as mentioned before, how can we possibly assume to know the mind of God in any theory? Such a change brings this and all theories into question and takes us back to the other questions about God and any purpose we may have in the Universe. See related topics 'The ultimate purpose of humanity' and 'Defining God' also. What are your views / reasons about this theory? If you don't support this theory, say why in your view / reason. If you have an alternate theory to promote, create a new topic to debate it, rather than adding it as a view for this debate.